Banking Lobbyists Propose Spending $850,000 To Smash OWS With a Fiery Fist of Fascism*

*And by fas­cism I really just mean the pow­ers of oppres­sion that band together to squelch the cre­ative ener­gies, spirit, and free­dom of the human peo­ple. This ranges from every­thing to tyranny and plu­toc­racy to fas­cism and the Black Iron Prison insti­tuted by the Demi­urge & his archons. It just so hap­pens that it’s tak­ing the form this time of bank­ing lob­by­ists con­tem­plat­ing fund­ing polit­i­cal action against OWS before it gets too big for them too stop.

Oops. Too late...

A well-known Wash­ing­ton lob­by­ing firm with links to the finan­cial indus­try has pro­posed an $850,000 plan to take on Occupy Wall Street and politi­cians who might express sym­pa­thy for the protests, accord­ing to a memo obtained by the MSNBC pro­gram “Up w/ Chris Hayes.”

The pro­posal was writ­ten on the let­ter­head of the lob­by­ing firm Clark Lytle Geduldig & Cran­ford and addressed to one of CLGC’s clients, the Amer­i­can Bankers Association.

CLGC’s memo pro­poses that the ABA pay CLGC $850,000 to con­duct “oppo­si­tion research” on Occupy Wall Street in order to con­struct “neg­a­tive nar­ra­tives” about the protests and allied politi­cians. The memo also asserts that Demo­c­ra­tic vic­to­ries in 2012 would be detri­men­tal for Wall Street and tar­gets spe­cific races in which it says Wall Street would ben­e­fit by elect­ing Repub­li­cans instead.

Accord­ing to the memo, if Democ­rats embrace OWS, “This would mean more than just short-term polit­i­cal dis­com­fort for Wall Street. … It has the poten­tial to have very long-lasting polit­i­cal, pol­icy and finan­cial impacts on the com­pa­nies in the cen­ter of the bullseye.”

The memo also sug­gests that Demo­c­ra­tic vic­to­ries in 2012 should not be the ABA’s biggest con­cern. “… (T)he big­ger con­cern,” the memo says, “should be that Repub­li­cans will no longer defend Wall Street companies.”

Two of the memo’s authors, part­ners Sam Geduldig and Jay Cran­ford, pre­vi­ously worked for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. Geduldig joined CLGC before Boehner became speaker; Cran­ford joined CLGC this year after serv­ing as the speaker’s assis­tant for pol­icy. A third part­ner, Steve Clark, is report­edly “tight” with Boehner, accord­ing to a story by Roll Call that CLGC fea­tures on its website.

Jeff Sig­mund, an ABA spokesper­son, con­firmed that the asso­ci­a­tion got the memo. “Our Gov­ern­ment Rela­tions staff did receive the pro­posal – it was unso­licited and we chose not to act on it in any way,” he said in a state­ment to “Up.”

CLGC did not return calls seek­ing comment.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel declined to com­ment on the memo. But he responded to its char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of Repub­li­cans as defend­ers of Wall Street by say­ing, “My under­stand­ing is that Pres­i­dent Obama is the sin­gle largest recip­i­ent of dona­tions from Wall Street.”

On “Up” Sat­ur­day, Obama cam­paign adviser Anita Dunn responded by say­ing that the major­ity of the president’s re-election cam­paign is fueled by small donors. She rejected the sug­ges­tion that the pres­i­dent him­self is too close to Wall Street, say­ing “If that’s the case, why were tough finan­cial reforms passed over party line Repub­li­can opposition?”

The CLGC memo raises another issue that it says should be of con­cern to the finan­cial indus­try — that OWS might find com­mon cause with the Tea Party. “Well-known Wall Street com­pa­nies stand at the nexus of where OWS pro­tes­tors and the Tea Party over­lap on angered pop­ulism,” the memo says. “…This com­bi­na­tion has the poten­tial to be explo­sive later in the year when media reports cover the next round of bonuses and con­trast it with sto­ries of mil­lions of Amer­i­cans mak­ing do with less this hol­i­day season.”

The memo out­lines a 60-day plan to con­duct sur­veys and research on OWS and its sup­port­ers so that Wall Street com­pa­nies will be pre­pared to con­duct a media cam­paign in response to OWS. Wall Street com­pa­nies “likely will not be the best spokes­peo­ple for their own cause,” accord­ing to the memo. “A big chal­lenge is to demon­strate that these com­pa­nies still have polit­i­cal strength and that mak­ing them a polit­i­cal tar­get will carry a severe polit­i­cal cost.”

Part of the plan CLGC pro­poses is to do “statewide sur­veys in at least eight states that are shap­ing up to be the most impor­tant of the 2012 cycle.”

Spe­cific races listed in the memo are U.S. Sen­ate races in Florida, Penn­syl­va­nia, Vir­ginia, Wis­con­sin, Ohio, New Mex­ico and Nevada as well as the guber­na­to­r­ial race in North Carolina.

The memo indi­cates that CLGC would research who has con­tributed finan­cial back­ing to OWS, not­ing that, “Media reports have spec­u­lated about asso­ci­a­tions with George Soros and others.”

It will be vital,” the memo says, “to under­stand who is fund­ing it and what their back­grounds and motives are. If we can show that they have the same cyn­i­cal moti­va­tion as a polit­i­cal oppo­nent it will under­mine their cred­i­bil­ity in a pro­found way.”

 

In older, and unre­lated news, Col­bert is  mem­ber of the Illu­mi­nati, thanks to a few beau­ti­ful Dis­cor­dians. This bodes well for the Illuminati.

Also, sick beatz, d00d. No really, check it out. Immor­tal Tech­nique has also come out with some OWS related stuff. but I’ll let you find that yourself.

Leave a Response